Canadians need and deserve a government that is on their side, a government that works for the people, and not for the profits of corporations and the ultra-wealthy. With the rise of global conflict and authoritarianism, climate-related environmental disasters, and an ever-deepening wealth disparity, Canadians need a government that is focused on making their lives better more than ever.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau promised that 2015 will be the last election held under the outdated first-past-the-post system. It is past time for Canadians to have a modern proportional representation system and a strong democracy to better ensure that every vote counts. We must also lower the voting age so that young people who will be most impacted by the decisions we make today have their voices heard.

As your representative, I will work every day to amplify the voices of Van East and to hold the government accountable, and to push them to do more for Canadians.

Weeks ago, IRCC promised that the citizenship reviews for individuals under Bill C-3 would be resolved "within a matter of days". Yet, my office continues to hear from distraught families who have been left completely in the dark—facing suspended citizenship certificates and revoked passports with zero explanation, timelines, or communication from the government.  

This is an unacceptable failure of procedural fairness. We are seeing shocking inconsistency, where one family member has their passport seized while others based on the same lineage do not. To make matters worse, my office has received a report of a serious privacy breach where sensitive personal data was mailed to the wrong applicant.  

These individuals followed the rules, provided extensive documentation, and had their Canadian citizenship officially recognized. They should not be subjected to prolonged trauma and institutional finger-pointing.  I have written an open letter to Immigration Minister Lena Diab demanding immediate accountability.

Parliament passed Bill C-3 to correct historical wrongs for Lost Canadians, not to create a new era of fear and uncertainty where the government can strip your status without explanation. Minister Diab must act now.  

*Click [ Read more ] to read the full letter.

The RCMP says it wasn’t its job to ensure its newest border patrol helicopter was allowed to fly in Canada, even as it defends paying for the Black Hawk it can’t use after it was grounded because of concerns from Transport Canada. 

The Mounties also won’t reveal the cost of the daily fees they are paying towards the $7.5-million contract for the idle chopper, as critics demand answers from Ottawa over how the RCMP chose a helicopter that’s not eligible to fly in Canada over other options.

“The Carney government must provide a full accounting of how this contract was awarded, who approved it, what due diligence was undertaken, and what steps will be taken to protect public funds going forward, especially given the massive increases in military spending that are forecast over the coming years,” NDP public safety critic Jenny Kwan said in a statement to the Star.

*Click image or link to read the news story - https://www.thestar.com/politics/federal/not-our-job-to-ensure-border-patrol-helicopter-could-fly-in-canada-rcmp-says/article_aa75841e-c421-43ca-960b-47ef24197c0b.html

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

NDP Housing Critic Jenny Kwan Statement on Government Spin on the “Condo Conversion” Program
 
The federal and BC governments continue to speak about creating pathways to homeownership, yet their decision to purchase existing distressed condominium units raises important questions about whether public policy is addressing the root causes of housing unaffordability. The condo purchase plan comes after the Community Housing Fund was indefinitely suspended in BC when housing organizations had shovel ready projects they had already invested in.  No amount of double speak will hide the fact that the Federal government failed to set affordability targets for the creation of Build Canada Homes and the bill that authorized the expenditure of $1.713 billion of public funds contained no meaningful safeguards, no measurable affordability requirements and no clear accountability mechanisms. 
  
This approach is not a plan to support homeownership for first time buyers, rather, it’s an investment banker’s plan.  At the heart of Condo Conversion program are the interests of investors and financial institutions.  That is also why Carney has eliminated the Underused Housing Tax in their last budget and has not extended the foreign buyer ban when it expires at the end of the year.  

There are alternative approaches that deserve greater attention. For years, the NDP has called for the Federal government to end special tax treatment for housing profiteers such as Real Estate Investment Trusts and to change tax policies that currently favour large institutional ownership of residential real estate.  In addition, the NDP has advocated for measures to discourage speculative accumulation of multiple investment properties, and consider measures such as progressively higher down payment requirements for the purchase of additional residential properties as is done in other countries including Singapore. These types of reforms prioritizes the treatment of housing as a primary home and discourage housing profiteering and create a level playing field for first time home buyers. 

Canadians deserve a housing strategy that addresses the causes of unaffordability, not just the symptoms and they deserve answers.  

Why are governments using public funds to purchase existing condominium units rather than focusing those resources on increasing overall affordable housing supply?

What analysis has been conducted on the impact of these purchases on local housing markets and first-time buyers?

How many units could be created through new construction or partnerships with non-profit housing providers for the same level of public investment?

Why has the government chosen this approach over policies aimed at reducing speculative demand and excessive investor activity?

Why is the government not extending the foreign buyer ban? 

Why were there no affordability and accountability requirements in Bill C-26?

Will the Parliamentary Budget Office have the opportunity to conduct an independent analysis of this proposal?

Canadians deserve a housing strategy that addresses the root causes of unaffordability, not just the symptoms. Directing public funding to the private market to purchase unabsorbed condos to bailout developers because, as the Prime Minister says they “are stuck” and “they do not want to sell at a loss, but they also can’t afford to hold the empty units indefinitely” reflects the wrong approach and priorities to deliver affordable homes to Canadians. Pretending that this is turning unsold condo-units into affordable housing is a slap in the face of the dedicated work of non-profit and co-op housing providers who are experts at this work.  The government should reconsider this decision and bring back something more tailored to the conditions on the ground.

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Statement by Jenny Kwan on Lost Canadians Suspension of Citizenship Certificates

The federal government's sudden reversal on the suspension of citizenship certificates issued under the new citizenship-by-descent provisions raises more questions on how IRCC is carrying out its mandate under the current Minister.

Just days after some newly recognized Canadians were suddenly, without warning, ordered to surrender their citizenship certificates and informed that their status was under review, IRCC has now begun notifying many of those same individuals that their citizenship claims are valid after all.

According to those affected, no new evidence was requested and no additional documentation was provided between the decision to revoke their certificates and the decision to reinstate them.

Canadians deserve to know: what happened?

For families who had finally received recognition of their Canadian citizenship after years of waiting, these letters caused enormous distress. Some were told that their citizenship certificates were no longer valid. Others were warned that any passport issued on the basis of those certificates could be invalidated. Families were left wondering whether they could trust the very documents the government had issued to them.

The Minister has acknowledged that an internal review is underway. That review must be accompanied by a full public explanation.

I am calling on the Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship to answer the following questions:

  • Why were these citizenship certificates suspended in the first place?
  • What changed between the original surrender notices and the subsequent revalidation letters?
  • How many people were affected by these actions?
  • Why were applicants not given an opportunity to provide clarification or additional evidence before being ordered to surrender their citizenship certificates?
  • What measures are being put in place to ensure this does not happen again?

The fact that some files were apparently reinstated without any new evidence raises serious concerns about the consistency of the department's decision-making process.

This issue extends beyond the individuals who received surrender letters. More than 4,000 people have obtained citizenship under the amended citizenship-by-descent provisions, and many are now wondering whether their own status could be called into question without warning.

Citizenship is a fundamental legal status that shapes a person's future, family plans, mobility, and sense of belonging. Canadians should be able to have confidence that when the government grants citizenship, that decision has been properly reviewed, verified and can be relied upon.

The Minister owes affected families a clear explanation of what went wrong and what safeguards will be put in place to prevent this from happening again.

 

Two years and one general election later, Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree says the long-awaited foreign influence registry is “weeks” away from being operational. Yet, as his department is confident it is “very close to the finish line” after repeated missed deadlines and delays, critics say combatting foreign interference and transnational repression is “clearly not a priority” for the current Liberal government.   

During a press conference in the West Block foyer on June 17, NDP MP Jenny Kwan (Vancouver East, B.C.), her party’s public safety and national security critic, also criticized Anandasangaree for repeatedly failing to deliver on his previously promised timelines.


NDP MP Jenny Kwan says continued delays are signaling it is ‘open season’ in Canada for malign foreign actors. The Hill Times photograph by Andrew Meade
Kwan said Prime Minister Mark Carney (Nepean, Ont.) has “dropped the ball,” but that “Canadians are still subject to foreign interference attacks” from countries like China, Russia, and India, and, in the case of the upcoming referendum on Alberta separatism, from the United States, as well. 

In an interview with CBC’s The House in early May, Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) director Dan Rogers said that the referendum “is rife for amplification or for the sort of disinformation or foreign interference that we’ve seen from players like Russia in the past.”

A May 6 report authored by DisinfoWatch, the Canadian Digital Media Research Network, and CASiLabs also warned that Russian and pro-Trump U.S. actors are amplifying and spreading disinformation to “normalize” Alberta separatism, “amplify distrust, portray Canada as internally divided and politically unstable, and create uncertainty that could deter international investment.”

“This cannot be acceptable,” Kwan said, adding that, to protect Canada’s sovereignty, “our democratic institutions and our democratic rights need to be protected from foreign interference actors.”

In a follow-up interview, Kwan said that despite the concerns raised by CSIS and diaspora communities under direct threat from transnational repression and interference, she believes that Carney has been “slow walking” the registry.

Now, she said, alongside her suspicion that the delay is intended to avoid upsetting trade negotiations with China or India, she has to question whether the same considerations are being applied to the Americans.

Whatever the reason for the delay, Kwan said the excuses have not diminished the threats Canadians or the country’s democratic institutions face, but are instead sending “a clear message to foreign interference actors that Canada is open season.”

“Alberta’s voter list has already been compromised,” Kwan said. “Is that not serious enough for the Carney government to take this seriously and get a move on?”

“This was the will of the previous Parliament, and Carney talked about how important this is during the campaign, but afterwards, he’s forgotten all about it,” Kwan said. “It clearly is not a priority.”

In response to questions from The Hill Times, Anandasangaree’s office said the final regulations “should be gazetted soon,” and that the registry “will be up and running later this summer.”

*Click image or link to read the full news story - https://www.hilltimes.com/2026/06/23/critics-say-liberals-slow-walking-foreign-influence-registry-leaves-canada-vulnerable-ahead-of-referendum/508941/?utm_source=The+Hill+Times&utm_campaign=f9702a0d0c-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2026_06_22_07_19&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_251d35861a-f9702a0d0c-94024765&mc_cid=f9702a0d0c&mc_eid=4520aaba21

 

Liberals are dismissing the privacy concerns surrounding the government’s lawful access bill as “tinfoil hat” and “paranoid” conspiracy theories, even after amending the controversial legislation to address some of those issues.

The House of Commons passed Bill C-22 on Thursday before breaking for the summer, a day after approving a motion to fast-track the bill and end debate at the public safety committee, which was then forced to approve it just before midnight without debating dozens of outstanding amendments.

The amended bill will now head to the Senate.

The legislation would give law enforcement the ability to get access to digital information more quickly and easily for investigations under a judicial warrant.

NDP MP Jenny Kwan, who represented her party during the committee’s study, also criticized the process and said the amended bill “did not fix the central problem: Canadians are still being asked to trust broad surveillance powers, secret orders, and future regulations that Parliament itself has never fully examined.”

“Canadians deserve legislation that protects both public safety and fundamental rights,” Kwan said in a statement Thursday.

“Instead, the government chose to curtail committee debate while dozens of amendments remained under consideration. The centralizing approach of the Carney government continues.”

*Click image or link to read the news story - https://globalnews.ca/news/11911957/lawful-access-bill-passes-privacy-liberals-tinfoil-hat/

Are you ready to take action?

Contact Jenny
Mobile Offices
Constituent Resources

Sign up for updates