
Public Policy: Emissions Pricing and Affordability: Lessons from British Columbia
School of Public Policy
University of Calgary
EMISSIONS PRICING AND AFFORDABILITY: LESSONS FROM BRITISH COLUMBIA
How does emissions pricing affect affordability in Canada? BC, with the longest-running carbon tax, offers some lessons.
Some blame emissions pricing for increasing costs and decreasing energy affordability. Concerns about affordability in Atlantic Canada even prompted the Government of Canada to exempt heating oil from the federal fuel charge until March 31, 2027.
Emissions pricing affects households’ costs in two ways. First, it directly increases the price of fuels based on the amount of CO2 emitted as they are burned. The 2023 price is $65 per tonne, which translates into 14.3 cents per litre of gasoline and $3.32 per GJ of natural gas. Second, increases in the price of fossil fuels — gasoline, diesel, natural gas, heating oil etc. — trickle through the supply chain, indirectly raising the price of goods and services across the economy and so increasing households’ costs.
The effect of emissions pricing on the prices of goods and services can be measured using the effective tax rate: the ratio of carbon taxes paid to total expenditure on a specific product. It includes both direct and indirect costs, meaning it shows the full burden of the tax relative to its absence.
For most goods and services, BC’s carbon tax of $65 per tonne adds less than 0.3% to the cost.
The figure uses the latest estimates from Statistics Canada to calculate BC’s effective carbon tax rates for a range of goods and services. From a high of 0.9% for relatively energy-intensive air transportation to lower than 0.12% for insurance and financial services, the figure shows how necessities like food or clothing and footwear are increased by the province’s carbon tax by 0.33% and 0.2%, respectively.
While some politicians and policymakers are blaming emissions pricing for high costs of living, the figure shows that the actual effect is quite modest for most items.
Editorial Practices Statement: This manuscript is a rapid contribution to the policy conversation that has been open-reviewed by at least one University of Calgary faculty member prior to publication.
DECEMBER 2023
Emissions pricing is just one of many indirect taxes that households face. Other examples are sales taxes and alcohol levies. We estimate that the combined effect on Canadian consumer prices from all indirect tax increases between January 2015 and October 2023 was 0.6%.
Knowing that much of the present affordability crisis is due to factors other than emissions pricing, the elimination of the carbon tax is unlikely to solve the problem. As Canada slowly recovers from high inflation in 2021 and 2022, policy makers will need to consider alternative solutions.
Latest posts
MPs question Lena Diab's performance at question period and in committee
Criticism is coming not only from opposition parties, but also from Diab's own Liberal colleagues.
Away from the cameras, 10 Liberal MPs spoke to Radio-Canada about her performance. They were granted confidentiality in order to express themselves freely.
Of those, only one defended Diab's job performance. Although several of them emphasized that she is a "good person" in charge of a "difficult" portfolio, nine MPs said they believe that the minister is overwhelmed and are openly questioning her place at the cabinet table.
"It doesn't make sense. In the House of Commons, many MPs hold their breath when she answers questions from the opposition," said one Liberal elected official.
"We're afraid she'll put her foot in her mouth."
New Democrat Jenny Kwan, her party's immigration critic, said that both Carney and Diab are responsible for how the immigration file is handled.
"That responsibility is to be responsive to stakeholders, to take these issues seriously, to examine the policies, to evaluate them, to hear from opposition and the public and look for ways to improve them," she said.
"That is their job."
Click image or link to read the news story - https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/lena-diab-immigration-minister-criticism-9.7103914
Conservatives are capitalizing on the recent drop in public support for immigration, but risk being seen as too MAGA adjacent, say observers. Meanwhile, the immigration minister's own colleagues question her handling of the file.
The Conservatives’ defeated motion targeting health-care coverage for asylum claimants shows weaknesses on both the part of the Liberal immigration minister and the official opposition leader, with MAGA-like rhetoric posing political risk for the latter, observers say.
Jordan Leichnitz, a former NDP strategist who now works for the German non-profit Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, told The Hill Times in a Feb. 26 interview that the Conservatives’ pressure on the immigration file is a reflection of their own political fragility.
“To me, it’s a manifestation of their political weakness right now. They turn to these arguments because they’re very mobilizing for segments of their base at moments where they feel politically more vulnerable,” she said.


