Public Policy: Emissions Pricing and Affordability: Lessons from British Columbia
Public Policy: Emissions Pricing and Affordability: Lessons from British Columbia
School of Public Policy
University of Calgary
EMISSIONS PRICING AND AFFORDABILITY: LESSONS FROM BRITISH COLUMBIA
How does emissions pricing affect affordability in Canada? BC, with the longest-running carbon tax, offers some lessons.
Some blame emissions pricing for increasing costs and decreasing energy affordability. Concerns about affordability in Atlantic Canada even prompted the Government of Canada to exempt heating oil from the federal fuel charge until March 31, 2027.
Emissions pricing affects households’ costs in two ways. First, it directly increases the price of fuels based on the amount of CO2 emitted as they are burned. The 2023 price is $65 per tonne, which translates into 14.3 cents per litre of gasoline and $3.32 per GJ of natural gas. Second, increases in the price of fossil fuels — gasoline, diesel, natural gas, heating oil etc. — trickle through the supply chain, indirectly raising the price of goods and services across the economy and so increasing households’ costs.
The effect of emissions pricing on the prices of goods and services can be measured using the effective tax rate: the ratio of carbon taxes paid to total expenditure on a specific product. It includes both direct and indirect costs, meaning it shows the full burden of the tax relative to its absence.
For most goods and services, BC’s carbon tax of $65 per tonne adds less than 0.3% to the cost.
The figure uses the latest estimates from Statistics Canada to calculate BC’s effective carbon tax rates for a range of goods and services. From a high of 0.9% for relatively energy-intensive air transportation to lower than 0.12% for insurance and financial services, the figure shows how necessities like food or clothing and footwear are increased by the province’s carbon tax by 0.33% and 0.2%, respectively.
While some politicians and policymakers are blaming emissions pricing for high costs of living, the figure shows that the actual effect is quite modest for most items.
Editorial Practices Statement: This manuscript is a rapid contribution to the policy conversation that has been open-reviewed by at least one University of Calgary faculty member prior to publication.
DECEMBER 2023
Emissions pricing is just one of many indirect taxes that households face. Other examples are sales taxes and alcohol levies. We estimate that the combined effect on Canadian consumer prices from all indirect tax increases between January 2015 and October 2023 was 0.6%.
Knowing that much of the present affordability crisis is due to factors other than emissions pricing, the elimination of the carbon tax is unlikely to solve the problem. As Canada slowly recovers from high inflation in 2021 and 2022, policy makers will need to consider alternative solutions.
Latest posts
How your data determines what you pay!
What if the price you pay at the store is different than the person standing next to you?
Corporations can use personal data such as location, device type, browsing history, purchase behavior, login status, and loyalty cards/programs to profile consumers and determine what different people are charged for the same goods and services.
How can we stop this from happening in Canada?
Join MP Jenny Kwan, Patrick Johnson - President of UFCW 1518, Jim Stanford - Economist and Director of Centre for Future Work, Avi Lewis - NDP Leader and Benjamin Fung - Canada Research Chair in Data Mining for Cybersecurity and other experts, for a public forum and community conversation about what surveillance pricing means for consumers and workers, how technology and personal data are changing the way prices are set, and what everyday people can do to fight back.
*Scan QR code, click the image or this link to register your attendance - https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/your-data-their-price-a-town-hall-on-surveillance-pricing-tickets-1998495899032
IRCC taking 33 months to process applications in wake of 'lost Canadians' law
When Pascal Sud and Meisha Smith prepared in January for the arrival of their first child, the choice seemed simple.
Smith would give birth in her home country of Jamaica where she had family support, and then they would together return to Montreal three months later.
At the time, the wait time for the citizenship certificate that their daughter, Sofianne, needed to fly back to Canada was between four and six weeks.
But more than eight months later, they're still waiting.
Sud is back at work in Montreal while Smith and Sofianne are still in Jamaica.
"It's been very frustrating," said Sud. "I was lucky to be there for three months … but I've been missing every step since, and it's been very difficult to be apart from them."
He's not alone.
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) is struggling to handle a flood of citizenship applications — many of them from a change to federal law late last year that allows anyone who can prove they have a Canadian ancestor to apply.
That backlog is preventing Canadians born abroad like Sofianne from coming home.
According to the department's most recent update on Sept. 3, there are 136,000 applications waiting to be processed. Those applying for a citizenship certificate now face a wait of 33 months.
NDP immigration critic Jenny Kwan called on the government to restore staffing and resources that were cut at IRCC, calling the processing delays "simply unreasonable and unacceptable."
*Click image or link to read the full news story - https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/canadian-citizenship-lost-canadians-c3-backlog-9.7366981