Bachrach calls on minister to stand up to big airlines, overhaul passenger protections
MEDIA RELEASE: NDP calls for automatic compensation when Canadians’ flights are delayed
MEDIA RELEASE: NDP calls for automatic compensation when Canadians’ flights are delayed
OTTAWA - On Thursday, NDP Transport Critic Taylor Bachrach (Skeena—Bulkley Valley) called for a suite of changes to air passenger protections, including automatic compensation for travellers whose flights are delayed.
“When your fight is delayed, your compensation shouldn’t be,” said Bachrach. “The fact Canadians are having to wait over 18 months for their complaints to be heard shows the Liberal government’s current approach is deeply flawed."
“Right now, people who’ve already endured the stress caused by delays and cancelled flights have to jump through endless hoops to be compensated, and the airlines are making sure it can take months or even years. When airlines’ flight schedules get snarled, people miss weddings, funerals and vacations they’ve been saving up for. Some are left stranded. The difficulty of a delayed or cancelled flight shouldn’t be followed by the nightmare of fighting for compensation.”
Bachrach said the Liberals’ original design of its Air Passenger Protection Regulations left massive loopholes that allow airlines to avoid paying people. As a result, the Canadian Transportation Agency has a backlog of 33,000 complaints from people who say they’ve been treated unfairly by airlines when it comes to compensation — about a two-year wait.
The issues over the holidays are part of a larger pattern of the Liberal government refusing to stand up to the airlines on behalf of passengers,” added Bachrach. “Minister of Transport Omar Alghabra can provide direction to both the Canadian Transportation Agency and the airlines themselves, but despite all the disruptions over the course of two travel seasons, he hasn’t once used that power.”
“New Democrats are calling for real protections for passengers, which would align with the protections European passengers already enjoy. Those include automatic compensation for flight disruptions, closing loopholes that let airlines avoid reimbursing travellers, and tougher enforcement. We will keep fighting for Canadians until the Liberals, and the big airlines start to treat them with respect.”
Latest posts
How your data determines what you pay!
What if the price you pay at the store is different than the person standing next to you?
Corporations can use personal data such as location, device type, browsing history, purchase behavior, login status, and loyalty cards/programs to profile consumers and determine what different people are charged for the same goods and services.
How can we stop this from happening in Canada?
Join MP Jenny Kwan, Patrick Johnson - President of UFCW 1518, Jim Stanford - Economist and Director of Centre for Future Work, Avi Lewis - NDP Leader and Benjamin Fung - Canada Research Chair in Data Mining for Cybersecurity and other experts, for a public forum and community conversation about what surveillance pricing means for consumers and workers, how technology and personal data are changing the way prices are set, and what everyday people can do to fight back.
*Scan QR code, click the image or this link to register your attendance - https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/your-data-their-price-a-town-hall-on-surveillance-pricing-tickets-1998495899032
A Parliamentary Secretary should not have to choose between doing their job and following their conscience. Sean Casey supported my private member’s bill, Bill C-233, which sought to close a loophole in Canada’s arms export regime that allows Canadian-made weapons to reach countries through the United States despite Canada’s own export controls. The bill was defeated in the House, with 22 MPs voting in favour and 295 against.
Sean Casey says he was removed from his position as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Veterans Affairs after supporting the bill.
If MPs cannot vote according to their conscience on a private member’s bill without risking their government position, what does a “free vote” actually mean?
I want to thank Sean Casey and the other MPs who supported Bill C-233 for standing up for the principle that Canada’s arms export controls must mean what they say—and that Parliament must be able to hold government policy to account.
The government can disagree with my bill. It can vote against it. But MPs should not have to fear losing their parliamentary responsibilities simply for voting according to their conscience.
*Click image or link to read the news story - https://www.cbc.ca/lite/story/9.7359007