OPEN LETTER to Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Disability Inclusion

I am writing you today to request that your office undertake to address the delays and technical errors that my constituents are experiencing with the Canada Recovery Benefit (CRB), and the new temporary changes to Employment Insurance (EI).
I have heard from two different constituents who received the same error message, COV-26, while attempting to apply for the CRB. The error apparently appears because CRA deems that the applicants have an active EI claim within the last 52 weeks which prevents them from accessing the CRB. However, both my constituents have not received any EI benefits in the last 52 weeks. They applied for EI when the pandemic first started and were transitioned to CERB as that was the policy in place.

"October 16, 2020

Dear Minister Freeland and Minister Qualtrough,

Open Letter RE: COV-26 and other errors with the CRB and EI application system

I am writing you today to request that your office undertake to address the delays and technical errors that my constituents are experiencing with the Canada Recovery Benefit (CRB), and the new temporary changes to Employment Insurance (EI).

I have heard from two different constituents who received the same error message, COV-26, while attempting to apply for the CRB. The error apparently appears because CRA deems that the applicants have an active EI claim within the last 52 weeks which prevents them from accessing the CRB. However, both my constituents have not received any EI benefits in the last 52 weeks. They applied for EI when the pandemic first started and were transitioned to CERB as that was the policy in place.

One of the constituents continued following up with Service Canada and found out why this error was appearing. He reached a Service Canada agent via phone and learned that his EI claim was in fact denied earlier this year. The Service Canada agent instructed him to submit the letter of denial to the CRA which would hopefully fix the issue with the COV-26 error. However, my constituent was unable to get a hold of CRA due to the high call volume.

My other constituent who received the same COV-26 error upon applying for CRB contacted CRA, and the CRA agent asked my constituent to obtain the letter of denial from Service Canada then fax it over to CRA. This is problematic for my constituent since they do not have a fax machine, and that this technology is no longer commonplace.

In addition to the COV-26 errors, another one of my constituents have been experiencing issues with the new EI policies. He contacted our office because he was not receiving the new EI rate set at the minimum floor rate of $500/week as stated in the government website. My staff

contacted the Service Canada MP line and the agent confirmed that my constituent’s EI rates is based on the old EI policies, and that the constituent needs to call Service Canada to terminate his old EI claim and re-apply in order to receive the new benefits. My constituent attempted to follow the instructions that the Service Canada agent provided. However, upon getting through to the Service Canada phone line after a five hour wait, the operator told my constituent that he was misinformed, and that he would not be eligible for the new EI with the adjusted rates if he were to terminate his current EI claim. However, the agent did not offer any alternative as to how this could be rectified. I hope you will agree that this contradicting information that Service Canada is providing my staff and my constituents is unacceptable. In addition, such technical problems is resulting in a delay for my constituents to get their application processed so they could receive the recovery benefits that they desperately need.

With the information provided above, I ask that these contradicting and confusing messages from CRA and Service Canada be addressed immediately.

Thank you in advance for your attention on this urgent matter, and I look forward to your prompt response.

Sincerely,
jenny signature - jpg.jpg
Jenny Kwan
Member of Parliament for Vancouver East"

Latest posts

Toronto Star NEWS: Canada launches ad campaign warning newcomers claiming asylum is ‘not easy’

When reached for comment, NDP immigration critic Jenny Kwan said the new measures are an abrupt shift from past policy.

“This about face from Prime Minister Trudeau is a shameless and insidious attempt to use newcomers such as migrants, international students, and asylum seekers as political cover,” Kwan said in a statement emailed to the Star.

It’s a dangerous game on Trudeau’s part, said Kwan, in trying to “shift the blame for his failures” to asylum seekers — one she called “a recipe to further hype-up hate, resentment and discrimination toward racialized people.

“Instead of wasting $250,000 on advertising, they should be investing those resources in processing applications,” said Kwan.

immigration.ca NEWS: Marc Miller to propose reforms to Canada’s Immigration and Asylum System

Political opposition has also been vocal. NDP immigration critic Jenny Kwan accused the government of scapegoating migrants for systemic issues, such as the housing crisis. Kwan called for a reversal of recent immigration changes, questioning their fairness to temporary residents and international students.

In response, Miller maintained that becoming a Canadian citizen is not a right.

Global NEWS: Sen. Woo downplays evidence that China ‘targeted’ MPs Chong, Kwan

In a statement, Kwan’s lawyer, Sujit Choudhry, said Woo’s allegation that the MP’s testimony was “flimsy” is “false and misleading.”

“It was CSIS who informed MP Kwan in a classified briefing that she was a long-time target of (Chinese Communist Party) interference and will remain an ‘evergreen target.’ MP Kwan testified and brought to the commissioner’s attention that she believed she had been de-platformed by Chinese community organizations,” Choudhry wrote in a statement to Global News.

Choudhry noted that CSIS officials testified that Beijing works through proxy agents in Canada’s Chinese diaspora and that Kwan is concerned the Chinese government used those proxies to target her for her advocacy on human rights issues in China.

“Senator Woo has every right to turn a blind eye to foreign interference actors and activities. MP Kwan chooses to use her voice to speak up and speak out to protect and defend Canada’s democratic institutions and processes.”