As we commemorate the centenary of the racist practices that the 1923 Chinese Exclusion Act encoded into law one hundred years, it is important to shine a light on this history, and to address the root causes of racism, hatred and discrimination. This unconscionable federal law prevented Chinese people from immigrating to Canada. It created untold sorrow and suffering, separated families and broke intergenerational ties. It undermined and prevented Chinese communities trying to grow and flourish in their new home in Canada.
This was just one of many racist laws that discriminated and segregated people on the basis of race and cultural or ethnic origin. Starting in 1885, the Federal government forced Chinese immigrants to pay a “head tax” on arrival to Canada. In 1908, the Federal government’s “continuous journey” rule was adopted to bar new migrants from Asian countries who travelled by ship routes with stopovers.
Different jurisdictions passed targeted laws to prevent migrants from Asian countries and racialized people from taking certain jobs, even to stop them from taking part in leisure activities like swimming.
During and after the Second World War, federal law caused thousands of Japanese Canadians to lose their personal property to seizure and face imprisonment in interment camps or forced labour in harsh conditions, far from home.
Statement on the marking of 100 years commemoration of Canada’s 1923 Chinese Exclusion Act
As we commemorate the centenary of the racist practices that the 1923 Chinese Exclusion Act encoded into law one hundred years, it is important to shine a light on this history, and to address the root causes of racism, hatred and discrimination. This unconscionable federal law prevented Chinese people from immigrating to Canada. It created untold sorrow and suffering, separated families and broke intergenerational ties. It undermined and prevented Chinese communities trying to grow and flourish in their new home in Canada.
This was just one of many racist laws that discriminated and segregated people on the basis of race and cultural or ethnic origin. Starting in 1885, the Federal government forced Chinese immigrants to pay a “head tax” on arrival to Canada. In 1908, the Federal government’s “continuous journey” rule was adopted to bar new migrants from Asian countries who travelled by ship routes with stopovers.
Different jurisdictions passed targeted laws to prevent migrants from Asian countries and racialized people from taking certain jobs, even to stop them from taking part in leisure activities like swimming.
During and after the Second World War, federal law caused thousands of Japanese Canadians to lose their personal property to seizure and face imprisonment in interment camps or forced labour in harsh conditions, far from home.
Content:
Statement: On marking the 100 year commemoration of Canada’s 1923 Chinese Exclusion Act
As we commemorate the centenary of the racist practices that the 1923 Chinese Exclusion Act encoded into law one hundred years, it is important to shine a light on this history, and to address the root causes of racism, hatred and discrimination. This unconscionable federal law prevented Chinese people from immigrating to Canada. It created untold sorrow and suffering, separated families and broke intergenerational ties. It undermined and prevented Chinese communities trying to grow and flourish in their new home in Canada.
This was just one of many racist laws that discriminated and segregated people on the basis of race and cultural or ethnic origin. Starting in 1885, the Federal government forced Chinese immigrants to pay a “head tax” on arrival to Canada. In 1908, the Federal government’s “continuous journey” rule was adopted to bar new migrants from Asian countries who travelled by ship routes with stopovers.
Different jurisdictions passed targeted laws to prevent migrants from Asian countries and racialized people from taking certain jobs, even to stop them from taking part in leisure activities like swimming.
During and after the Second World War, federal law caused thousands of Japanese Canadians to lose their personal property to seizure and face imprisonment in interment camps or forced labour in harsh conditions, far from home.
In 1872, B.C. became the first province to disenfranchise Chinese immigrants and remove their right to vote. The rest of Canada soon followed; it wasn’t until 1949 when Chinese Canadians could vote in their first federal election.
To this day we grapple with the effect of these and other racist laws designed to exclude and discriminate. Many Canadians have never learned the whole truth about our country’s colonial history and the genocide against Indigenous peoples. Their schooling diminished or outright ignored the long history of Chinese, Japanese, Filipino, Punjabi, and other Asian peoples in what is now Canada. People still fight to remove racial covenants that excluded people from owning land or a home from land titles.
Many immigrants coming to Canada as workers still are denied landed status on arrival, and instead are provided with temporary work permits that cause precarious status in Canada; or face a higher language testing requirement for permanent residency than the job requires; or are being classed as “low-skill” workers that does not reflect the true value of the essential work they do. This encodes discrimination against individuals and classes of people that are largely racialized, and serves to widen the gaps in our society instead of uniting people in equal rights and dignity.
We have to transform our laws institutions to reconcile and make reparation for Canada's colonial history, to root out systemic discrimination and to eliminate the root causes of poverty and inequality.
All people in Canada need to learn our country’s history of injustice against racialized Canadians and never let hate and discrimination prevail over justice and democracy.
Along with this racist history we face the very concerning rise in extremist and hate activity that has real impacts on our day-to-day life. According to a report from Bloomberg, Vancouver is the Asian hate capital of North America. In Vancouver, anti-Asian hate crimes went up 717% in 2020. Every one of these attacks is aimed at stripping us of our sense of safety and dignity. It is a clear message to say that we are not wanted and that we do not belong. It is not enough to say in words that these racist, hateful, discriminatory acts are wrong.
I am glad that the House of Commons unanimously adopted my 2021 motion that calls on the government to include anti-Asian racism in Canada's anti-racism strategy and in all anti-racism policies and programs.
Now it’s time to move to the next steps.
I am calling on the government to go farther than simply condemning anti-Asian hate racism, and all forms of racism and racial discrimination, and take meaningful action to combat the ongoing increase in Anti-Asian hate crimes and hate-motivated incidents through these measures:
• Provide an update to Parliament on specific calls for action to tackle anti-Asian hate;
• Ensure that police in all communities have properly funded, dedicated hate crime units;
• Create and fund a dedicated hate crime prosecution unit;
• Establish national standards for identifying and recording all hate incidents and their
dispensation in the justice system;
• Work in collaboration with non-profits to facilitate the reporting of hate crimes;
• Commit resources including, but not limited to, support for victims of anti-Asian hate that are
culturally specific and language accessible;
• Host a federal-provincial-territorial meeting to discuss the rise in hate crimes in Canada and
to coordinate our collective efforts and identify best practices to countering this trend; and
• Renew Canada’s Anti-racism Strategy through engagement with stakeholders and those with
lived experiences, highlight the unique lived realities of Anti-Asian racism and systemic barriers to inclusion experienced by people of Asian descent, and table the action plan that specifically addresses anti-Asian racism within 12 months.
These measures, if implemented, would go a long way to build truly inclusive community safety for all.
It is long past time that governments of all levels went the full distance to show with action and with resources that Canada is truly a welcoming home for all to live in equal dignity, with respect and with enjoyment of their full human rights, free from hatred and discrimination.
Please be assured that I will stand with the community every step of the way in this work.
Latest posts
MPs question Lena Diab's performance at question period and in committee
Criticism is coming not only from opposition parties, but also from Diab's own Liberal colleagues.
Away from the cameras, 10 Liberal MPs spoke to Radio-Canada about her performance. They were granted confidentiality in order to express themselves freely.
Of those, only one defended Diab's job performance. Although several of them emphasized that she is a "good person" in charge of a "difficult" portfolio, nine MPs said they believe that the minister is overwhelmed and are openly questioning her place at the cabinet table.
"It doesn't make sense. In the House of Commons, many MPs hold their breath when she answers questions from the opposition," said one Liberal elected official.
"We're afraid she'll put her foot in her mouth."
New Democrat Jenny Kwan, her party's immigration critic, said that both Carney and Diab are responsible for how the immigration file is handled.
"That responsibility is to be responsive to stakeholders, to take these issues seriously, to examine the policies, to evaluate them, to hear from opposition and the public and look for ways to improve them," she said.
"That is their job."
Click image or link to read the news story - https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/lena-diab-immigration-minister-criticism-9.7103914
Conservatives are capitalizing on the recent drop in public support for immigration, but risk being seen as too MAGA adjacent, say observers. Meanwhile, the immigration minister's own colleagues question her handling of the file.
The Conservatives’ defeated motion targeting health-care coverage for asylum claimants shows weaknesses on both the part of the Liberal immigration minister and the official opposition leader, with MAGA-like rhetoric posing political risk for the latter, observers say.
Jordan Leichnitz, a former NDP strategist who now works for the German non-profit Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, told The Hill Times in a Feb. 26 interview that the Conservatives’ pressure on the immigration file is a reflection of their own political fragility.
“To me, it’s a manifestation of their political weakness right now. They turn to these arguments because they’re very mobilizing for segments of their base at moments where they feel politically more vulnerable,” she said.


