



November 28, 2025
The Honourable Lena Metlege Diab
Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship
House of Commons
Ottawa, ON K1A 0A6
Via email: [email protected]
Dear Minister Diab,
Open letter re: Kneecap
I am writing to follow up on my letter to you dated October 2nd regarding the admissibility of Kneecap, the Irish musical group to Canada. I note that it has been two months since I have written, I have yet to receive your response to this critical matter.
Meanwhile, in response to an Order Paper Question, IRCC confirmed that admissibility decisions are made exclusively by designated officers—not by elected officials—and CBSA has stated that it was not consulted or involved in the decision by Parliamentary Secretary Gasparro to go public.
With respect to Mr. Liam Og Hanna's application, his eTA was cancelled for "omitting to disclose complete and accurate information on his application". The Order Paper Question response indicated that "[t]he applicant was notified of the reasons for this decision"; however, his legal counsel advised that the letter he received did not specify the reasons.
Could you please advise what omissions did Mr. Liam Og Hanna allegedly make in his eTA application that rendered his application “cancelled for admissibility”? Could you also provide the reasons for the cancellation of his eTA application?
Under Rule 9 of the Federal Courts Rules, the Minister must provide complete reasons for a decision. In response to the Rule 9 request, members of Kneecap received the same refusal letter, supplemented only by a single GCMS note stating that “[b]y not providing the requested documents, there are reasonable grounds to believe that the client’s required eTA information may not be genuine.” The note does not identify which “requested documents” were allegedly missing or explain how their absence rendered the eTA information “not genuine.” Liam Og Hanna never received any request for additional documents. In short, no information has been provided on what exactly was said to be omitted or “not genuine.”
With respect to the other two band members, they were simply advised not to travel because their applications remained under review with no timeline on when a decision would be made, nor was additional information requested for the application to complete the processing.
Mr. James John O Dochartaigh and Mr. Naoise O Caireallain both held valid eTAs but later received letters raising unspecified concerns about potential misrepresentation and requesting further documents. This effectively reopened their eTA applications and rendered the eTAs unusable for travel, though they were not formally refused. Both have now provided the requested documents and are awaiting a decision.
What is the estimated time for that process to be completed or will these applications remain undecided indefinitely to avoid having to make a decision that is politically sensitive as it may contradict the statement made by Parliamentary Secretary Vince Gasparro? The applications have been under review for two months now, but to date, no request for additional information have been made to the applicants. Could you please advise if there is any additional information needed to help with the decision-making process.
Your urgent attention to this matter is required and I look forward to your response.
Sincerely,
Jenny Kwan
Member of Parliament for Vancouver East
NDP Critic for Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship

Corporations can use personal data such as location, device type, browsing history, purchase behavior, login status, and loyalty cards/programs to profile consumers and determine what different people are charged for the same goods and services.
How can we stop this from happening in Canada?
Join MP Jenny Kwan, Patrick Johnson - President of UFCW 1518, Jim Stanford - Economist and Director of Centre for Future Work, Avi Lewis - NDP Leader and Benjamin Fung - Canada Research Chair in Data Mining for Cybersecurity and other experts, for a public forum and community conversation about what surveillance pricing means for consumers and workers, how technology and personal data are changing the way prices are set, and what everyday people can do to fight back.
IRCC taking 33 months to process applications in wake of 'lost Canadians' law
When Pascal Sud and Meisha Smith prepared in January for the arrival of their first child, the choice seemed simple.
Smith would give birth in her home country of Jamaica where she had family support, and then they would together return to Montreal three months later.
At the time, the wait time for the citizenship certificate that their daughter, Sofianne, needed to fly back to Canada was between four and six weeks.
But more than eight months later, they're still waiting.
Sud is back at work in Montreal while Smith and Sofianne are still in Jamaica.
"It's been very frustrating," said Sud. "I was lucky to be there for three months … but I've been missing every step since, and it's been very difficult to be apart from them."
He's not alone.
Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) is struggling to handle a flood of citizenship applications — many of them from a change to federal law late last year that allows anyone who can prove they have a Canadian ancestor to apply.
That backlog is preventing Canadians born abroad like Sofianne from coming home.
According to the department's most recent update on Sept. 3, there are 136,000 applications waiting to be processed. Those applying for a citizenship certificate now face a wait of 33 months.
NDP immigration critic Jenny Kwan called on the government to restore staffing and resources that were cut at IRCC, calling the processing delays "simply unreasonable and unacceptable."