CIMM#88: In Camera on Closed Work Permits and Temporary Foreign Workers

3:45 p.m.

 

The Chair Sukh Dhaliwal
Liberal

I call the meeting back to order.

I would like to thank Mr. Brunelle-Duceppe for his intervention.

As the chair, I fully respect that both official languages should be working simultaneously. As it is not working—and I don't want to put any extra pressure on the interpreters—we are making the decision to tell Mr. Obokata that we are extremely sorry, but it isn't working. We will try to arrange another time that will be mutually workable, when the system is working better, so that we can hear him and the interpreters can hear him and then interpret to the best of their ability.

Thank you for being with us.

With this, I will discharge the witness. We will suspend for a few minutes and then come back to the meeting again.

Thank you, Mr. Obokata.

I want to thank the interpreters, as well, for their understanding, given the pressure that they have.

Thank you.

[Proceedings continue in camera]

 

https://openparliament.ca/committees/immigration/44-1/88/the-chair-1/

Latest posts

FINA#147: Bill C-69 on Concerns Around Expanding Immigration Detention into Federal Prisons

Jenny Kwan Vancouver East, BC
NDP

Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. I will speak to it very briefly.

As I was indicating, on March 13, over 80 civil societies, settlement agencies and religious organizations wrote a strongly worded letter to the Prime Minister with their concerns around expanding immigration detention into federal prisons.

Earlier today, the provisions around setting up this format were passed, but with that being said, this amendment is an attempt by the NDP to at least try to put some parameters within that framework, to have “high risk” clearly defined in legislation rather than leaving it up to regulation and having it be defined behind closed doors.

To that end, Mr. Chair, that's what the amendment seeks to do. The definition of “high risk” is really meant to provide some limitations around what would be deemed as high risk in this instance.

Mr. Chair, I just want to highlight a couple of elements within that. I won't, of course, read the entire amendment into the record here.

Really, we attempted to put some parameters there as to the nature and level of danger to the public the person poses related to, for example, any conviction to do with sexual offences or an offence involving violence or weapons and for the same conviction outside of Canada. As well, there are provisions with regard to pending charges for these offences. Also, we wanted to put parameters around engagement with terrorism or gang activities and such.

Mr. Chair, I think these are some of the provisions for declaring what is deemed to be “high risk” in that context.

The other thing worth noting here is that we're also adding to this with an amendment around mental health; when considering these matters, the mental health aspect of the individual should also be taken into consideration. That's written within the amendment here.

Of course, there are some accountability measures related to it, which means that when someone is to be detained, there has to be some level of accountability with respect to written notice advising the individual as such and then, of course, allowing the individual to undertake representation if they seek to do so.

That's a quick summary of where it is at in terms of trying to put these parameters in place.

Are you ready to take action?

Constituent Resources
Mobile Offices
Contact Jenny

Sign up for updates